4.6 Article

A Clustering-Enhanced Memetic Algorithm for the Quadratic Minimum Spanning Tree Problem

期刊

ENTROPY
卷 25, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/e25010087

关键词

quadratic minimum spanning tree problem; memetic algorithm; combinatorial optimization; agglomerative clustering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a clustering-enhanced memetic algorithm to solve the quadratic minimum spanning tree problem. By using a population initialization method, a tabu-based nearby exploration phase, a three-parent combination operator, and a mutation operator, the algorithm achieves competitive results compared to state-of-the-art approaches.
The quadratic minimum spanning tree problem (QMSTP) is a spanning tree optimization problem that considers the interaction cost between pairs of edges arising from a number of practical scenarios. This problem is NP-hard, and therefore there is not a known polynomial time approach to solve it. To find a close-to-optimal solution to the problem in a reasonable time, we present for the first time a clustering-enhanced memetic algorithm (CMA) that combines four components, i.e., (i) population initialization with clustering mechanism, (ii) a tabu-based nearby exploration phase to search nearby local optima in a restricted area, (iii) a three-parent combination operator to generate promising offspring solutions, and (iv) a mutation operator using Levy distribution to prevent the population from premature. Computational experiments are carried on 36 benchmark instances from 3 standard sets, and the results show that the proposed algorithm is competitive with the state-of-the-art approaches. In particular, it reports improved upper bounds for the 25 most challenging instances with unproven optimal solutions, while matching the best-known results for all but 2 of the remaining instances. Additional analysis highlights the contribution of the clustering mechanism and combination operator to the performance of the algorithm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据