4.6 Article

Foraging Dynamics and Entropy Production in a Simulated Proto-Cell

期刊

ENTROPY
卷 24, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/e24121793

关键词

dissipative structure; foraging; entropy; maximum entropy production; entropy production; self organization; nonlinear dynamics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a simulated chemical dissipative structure acting as a proto cell was reported to better understand the thermodynamics of biological systems. By investigating the relationship between foraging dynamics and entropy production, it was found that there is a regulation mechanism between the dynamical steady states and entropy production. These results provide both support for and contradictions to the maximum entropy production principle.
All organisms depend on a supply of energetic resources to power behavior and the irreversible entropy-producing processes that sustain them. Dissipative structure theory has often been a source of inspiration for better understanding the thermodynamics of biology, yet real organisms are inordinately more complex than most laboratory systems. Here we report on a simulated chemical dissipative structure that operates as a proto cell. The simulated swimmer moves through a 1D environment collecting resources that drive a nonlinear reaction network interior to the swimmer. The model minimally represents properties of a simple organism including rudimentary foraging and chemotaxis and an analog of a metabolism in the nonlinear reaction network. We evaluated how dynamical stability of the foraging dynamics (i.e., swimming and chemotaxis) relates to the rate of entropy production. Results suggested a relationship between dynamical steady states and entropy production that was tuned by the relative coordination of foraging and metabolic processes. Results include evidence in support of and contradicting one formulation of a maximum entropy production principle. We discuss the status of this principle and its relevance to biology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据