4.7 Article

Addition of aspirin to a fish oil-rich diet decreases inflammation and atherosclerosis in ApoE-null mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUTRITIONAL BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 35, 期 -, 页码 58-65

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2016.05.012

关键词

Atherosclerosis; Inflammation; Fish oil; Omega-3 fatty acids; Aspirin

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01GM038765, P01GM095467]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aspirin (ASA) is known to alter the production of potent inflammatory lipid mediators, but whether it interacts with omega-3 fatty acids (FAs) from fish oil to affect atherosclerosis has not been determined. The goal was to investigate the impact of a fish oil-enriched diet alone and in combination with ASA on the production of lipid mediators and atherosclerosis. ApoE(-/-) female mice were fed for 13 weeks one of the four following diets: omega-3 FA deficient (OD), omega-3 FA rich (OR) (1.8 g omega-3 FAs/kg.diet per day), omega-3 FA rich plus ASA (ORA) (0.1 g ASA/kg.diet per day) or an omega-3 FA deficient plus ASA (ODA) with supplement levels equivalent to human doses. Plasma lipids, atherosclerosis, markers of inflammation, hepatic gene expression and aortic lipid mediators were determined. Hepatic omega-3 FAs were markedly higher in OR (9.9-fold) and ORA (7-fold) groups. Mice in both OR and ORA groups had 40% less plasma cholesterol in very low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein fractions, but aortic plaque area formation was only significantly lower in the ORA group (5.5%) compared to the OD group (2.5%). Plasma PCSK9 protein levels were approximately 70% lower in the OR and ORA groups. Proinflammatory aortic lipid mediators were 50%-70% lower in the ODA group than in the OD group and more than 50% lower in the ORA group. In summary, less aortic plaque lesions and aortic proinflammatory lipid mediators were observed in mice on the fish oil diet plus ASA vs. just the fish oil diet. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据