4.7 Article

Experimental study on the methane desorption-diffusion behavior of Longmaxi shale exposure to supercritical CO2

期刊

ENERGY
卷 262, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125456

关键词

Shale gas; Supercritical carbon dioxide; Desorption kinetics; Diffusion coefficient; CO2 enhanced shale gas recovery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the desorption-diffusion behaviors of CH4 in shale after supercritical CO2 injection, and finds that ScCO2 exposure can enhance the desorption and diffusion of CH4 in shale, with slight dependence on exposure pressure and temperature.
Desorption-diffusion behaviors of CH4 in shale after supercritical CO2 (ScCO2) injection are closely related to CO2 enhanced shale gas recovery (CO2-ESGR). A self-developed gas desorption test system was used to measure the desorption kinetics of CH4 in shale collected from Sichuan Basin at different ScCO2 exposure pressures (8, 12, 16 MPa) and temperatures (40, 60, 80 degrees C), and the low-pressure N-2 adsorption was performed to evaluate the variations of pore structure of shale. Results indicate that the desorption kinetics curves of CH4 in shale exhibit typical Langmuir characteristics under different desorption pressures, and the kinetics data were fitted by unipore and bidisperse diffusion models, manifesting that the diffusion of CH4 in the shale samples are dominated by macroporous channel (>95%). With increasing desorption pressure, the desorption capacity of CH4 in shale (n(de)) increased, while the diffusion coefficient of CH4 in shale (D) decreased. Additionally, the n(de) and D increased after ScCO2 exposure, and exhibited a slight exposure pressure and temperature dependence, which is mainly caused by the decrease of specific surface area and the widening of microstructure in shale, implying that the ScCO2-shale interaction can promote the desorption-diffusion of CH4 in shale. This study provides a theoretical reference for CO2-ESGR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据