4.7 Article

Introducing a new wind speed complementarity model

期刊

ENERGY
卷 265, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.126284

关键词

Variable renewable energy; Complementarity; Capacity factor; Wind resource assessment; Kappa distribution; UERRA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Minimizing residual load is crucial in countries with high shares of variable renewable energies (VRE). A new high-spatiotemporal resolution wind speed model (WiCoMo) is developed to adjust wind turbine site selection to residual load, considering the national residual load in Germany. The model maps the suitability of wind turbine sites, showing higher suitability in southern Germany compared to other regions.
Minimizing the residual load is essential in countries with a high share of variable renewable energies (VRE). Optimally, new wind turbine sites provide high resource availability and the potential for smoothing the tem-poral course of the residual load. Current high spatial resolution wind atlases are limited to the ability to find high capacity factor (CF) sites but do not provide CF during periods of high residual load. Thus, we derive a new high-spatiotemporal resolution wind speed model for adjusting wind turbine site selection to residual load. The model (WiCoMo) is developed at six-hourly temporal resolution and 25 m x 25 spatial resolution up to 200 m height from 1991 to 2018 in the study area of Germany. Residual load-weighted and adjusted CF in 2015-2018 is mapped using the new model and considering the national residual load. Besides, complementarity between CF and VRE is evaluated. According to the standard CF, there is a northwest-southeast CF gradient. Relying on the residual load adjusted CF site suitability in southern Germany increases compared to the rest of the country. The introduced model may be a valuable tool for adapting wind resource assessment in Germany on the increasing role of VRE in the electricity mix.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据