4.7 Review

Operation optimization approaches of electric vehicle battery swapping and charging station: A literature review

期刊

ENERGY
卷 263, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.126095

关键词

Review; Electric vehicle; Battery swapping mode; Battery swapping and charging station; Operation optimization model; Vehicle scheduling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the operation optimization approaches for EV battery swapping and charging stations. It analyzes the mathematical methods used in the process and examines the current operation mode and optimization objectives. The paper also discusses the merits and drawbacks of previous studies and suggests future research opportunities.
The battery swapping mode (BSM) for an electric vehicle (EV) is an efficient way of replenishing energy. However, there have been perceived operation-related issues related large-scale deployment of the BSM. How-ever, previous reviews have failed to examine the mathematical methods of the operation optimization process, which are highlighted in this work. The paper aims to provide a complete and systematic overview of the operation optimization approaches for EV battery swapping and charging stations. This work addresses the current operation mode of battery swapping networks and examines the optimization objectives, constraints, and mathematical programming methods. The paper highlights the motivations of different ownership models for establishing different objectives and discusses the merits and drawbacks of approaches in previous studies for different application scenarios. For the possible focus of future work, the paper details opportunities and chal-lenges of dynamic service pricing, battery-to-grid scheduling, and behavior scheduling. This review aids future research of battery charging and swapping station operation and vehicle scheduling, and provides a systematic and theoretical reference for model selection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据