4.7 Article

Energy rebound effect of various industries in China: Based on hybrid energy input-output model

期刊

ENERGY
卷 261, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125147

关键词

Energy rebound effect; Energy consumption; Input-output model

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [72074186, 71673230]
  2. Soft Science Plan Funded Project of Fujian Province [2021R0005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

China's rapid economic development has resulted in excessive energy consumption and the emergence of energy rebound effect. This paper examines the energy rebound effect in various industries in China and finds that the indirect rebound effect is higher than the direct rebound effect in most sectors. The study also reveals a correlation between energy efficiency, industry forward linkage degree, and the energy rebound effect.
China's economy has developed rapidly relying on a large amount of production factors input. It has caused excessive consumption of fossil energy which led to a series of social problems. Although Chinese government adopted various measures to reduce energy use, the existence of the energy rebound effect affects the results of energy saving. Therefore, it is necessary to study and carry out the energy rebound effect of various industries in China. This paper works out ten hybrid energy input-output tables (value type) based on the ten input-output tables and energy consumption of the sub-sector from 1987 to 2012. Relying on the supply-driven Ghosh input-output model, this paper calculates the energy rebound effect of industries from 1987 to 2012 in China, and then analyzes the factors which may affect the energy rebound effect value. The results show that: The energy indirect rebound effect is much higher than direct energy rebound effect in most sectors; the higher energy efficiency, the lower direct energy rebound effect; the higher forward linkage degree of industry, the greater indirect rebound effect of energy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据