4.5 Article

Heat Integration for Phenols and Ammonia Recovery Process of Coal Gasification Wastewater Considering Optimization of Process Parameters

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 15, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en15239258

关键词

coal gasification wastewater; heat exchanger network; heat integration; genetic algorithm

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. [22178113]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By optimizing the phenols and ammonia recovery process, the new heat integration process saves 14.3% energy consumption and reduces the total annual cost by about 15.1% compared to the original process parameters. The new heat integration process provides guidance for the optimization of the phenols and ammonia recovery process.
A heat integration optimization method that considers the changes in process parameters is proposed to find the global optimal process scheme for a coal chemical company's phenols and ammonia recovery process. The phenols and ammonia recovery process is simulated by Aspen Plus, and a programming method for heat exchanger networks synthesis that can simultaneously optimize process parameters and heat integration is constructed by Matlab. Taking the total annual cost as the objective function, the following process parameters are optimized: the hot feed temperature and cold/hot feed ratio of sour water stripper, the temperature of three-step partial condensation system, the feed temperature and column pressure of both solvent distillation column and solvent stripper. The result shows that, compared with the heat integration process under original process parameters, the new heat integration process saves 14.3% energy consumption and reduces the total annual cost by about 15.1%. The new heat integration process provides guidance for the optimization of the phenols and ammonia recovery process. The proposed heat integration optimization method based on changing process parameters is an effective and practical tool that offers good application prospects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据