4.5 Review

A Critical Review on Geometric Improvements for Heat Transfer Augmentation of Microchannels

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 15, 期 24, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en15249474

关键词

geometry; microchannel; heat transfer; pressure drop; structure optimization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52276092, 21F20056]
  2. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China [ZR2020ME170]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reviews, classifies, and summarizes the microchannel geometry characteristics of previous studies. It mainly focuses on the impact of microchannel geometry features and structural design on heat transfer and pressure drop, and discusses the future research direction of microchannel geometry design.
With the application of microdevices in the building engineering, aerospace industry, electronic devices, nuclear energy, and so on, the dissipation of high heat flux has become an urgent problem to be solved. Microchannel heat sinks have become an effective means of thermal management for microdevices and enhancements for equipment due to their higher heat transfer and small scale. However, because of the increasing requirements of microdevices for thermal load and temperature control and energy savings, high efficiency heat exchangers, especially microchannels are receiving more and more attention. To further improve the performance of microchannels, optimizing the channel geometry has become a very important passive technology to effectively enhance the heat transfer of the microchannel heat sink. Therefore, in this paper, the microchannel geometry characteristics of previous studies are reviewed, classified and summarized. The review is mainly focused on microchannel geometry features and structural design to strengthen the effect of heat transfer and pressure drop. In addition, the correlation between boiling heat transfer and geometric characteristics of microchannel flow is also presented, and the future research direction of microchannel geometry design is discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据