4.5 Review

Atmospheric Drivers of Wind Turbine Blade Leading Edge Erosion: Review and Recommendations for Future Research

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 15, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en15228553

关键词

wind energy; wind turbines; aerodynamics; blade reliability; hydrometeors; erosion; kinetic energy transfer; metrology; hail; droplet size distributions

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy
  2. NASA grant [80NSSC21K1489]
  3. NSF Extreme Science and EngineeringDiscovery Environment [TG-ATM170024]
  4. US Department of Energy [DE-SC0016438]
  5. EUDP grant [64021-0003]
  6. University of Bergen [102235103]
  7. Equinor [102235103]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Leading edge erosion (LEE) of wind turbine blades can lead to decreased power production and increased costs. Understanding hydrometeor properties and joint probability distributions of precipitation and wind speeds is necessary. However, there is a lack of observational data for such locations.
Leading edge erosion (LEE) of wind turbine blades causes decreased aerodynamic performance leading to lower power production and revenue and increased operations and maintenance costs. LEE is caused primarily by materials stresses when hydrometeors (rain and hail) impact on rotating blades. The kinetic energy transferred by these impacts is a function of the precipitation intensity, droplet size distributions (DSD), hydrometeor phase and the wind turbine rotational speed which in turn depends on the wind speed at hub-height. Hence, there is a need to better understand the hydrometeor properties and the joint probability distributions of precipitation and wind speeds at prospective and operating wind farms in order to quantify the potential for LEE and the financial efficacy of LEE mitigation measures. However, there are relatively few observational datasets of hydrometeor DSD available for such locations. Here, we analyze six observational datasets from spatially dispersed locations and compare them with existing literature and assumed DSD used in laboratory experiments of material fatigue. We show that the so-called Best DSD being recommended for use in whirling arm experiments does not represent the observational data. Neither does the Marshall Palmer approximation. We also use these data to derive and compare joint probability distributions of drivers of LEE; precipitation intensity (and phase) and wind speed. We further review and summarize observational metrologies for hydrometeor DSD, provide information regarding measurement uncertainty in the parameters of critical importance to kinetic energy transfer and closure of data sets from different instruments. A series of recommendations are made about research needed to evolve towards the required fidelity for a priori estimates of LEE potential.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据