4.5 Article

Experimental and Theoretical Investigation of the Synthesis, Electronic and Magnetic Properties of MnFe2O4 Spinel Ferrite

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 15, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en15228386

关键词

magnetic nanoparticle; spinel ferrite; magnetic properties; Monte Carlo simulation

资金

  1. United Arab Emirates University UPAR project [31N393]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MnFe2O4 ferrite nanoparticle was synthesized via sol-gel method and its structural, morphology, and magnetic characteristics were investigated. The experimental and theoretical results showed that MnFe2O4 is a soft ferromagnetic material.
MnFe2O4 ferrite nanoparticle was synthesized via the sol-gel method, and structural, morphology and magnetic characteristics were investigated. X-ray diffraction analysis showed that the synthesized sample was in a single phase with a spinel-ferrite-like structure (space group Fd-3m). The scanning electron microscopy displayed homogenous spherical grains with an agglomeration of the particles. The chemical composition determined by energy-dispersive spectroscopy shows the absence of any impurities. To understand the role of magnetic interaction in MnFe2O4 spinel ferrites, the structural and magnetic properties of MnFe2O4 have been explored theoretically. Based on the first-principles methods via density functional theory and Monte Carlo simulations, the magnetic hysteresis cycle has been plotted. Using the generalized gradient and GGA-PBE approximation in the full-potential linearized augmented plane wave (FP-LAPW) method, the exchange coupling interactions between magnetic elements and local magnetic moment were evaluated. Furthermore, the theoretical magnetic properties of MnFe2O4 were found to match the experimental ones. They both revealed that MnFe2O4 is a soft ferromagnetic material. The theoretical curve of magnetization versus temperature indicates that the transition occurred at T-c = 580.0 K. This was also in good agreement with the experimental Curie temperature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据