4.6 Article

INCIDENCE, RISK FACTORS, AND THE PROTECTIVE EFFECT OF HIGH BODY MASS INDEX AGAINST SARCOPENIA IN SUBURB-DWELLING ELDERLY CHINESE POPULATIONS

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION HEALTH & AGING
卷 20, 期 10, 页码 1056-1060

出版社

SPRINGER FRANCE
DOI: 10.1007/s12603-016-0704-3

关键词

AWGS; body mass index; Chinese; sarcopenia; suburb-dwelling

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81372118]
  2. Health and Family Planning Commission of Tianjin municipality [2014KZ006]
  3. Public Health Bureau of Tianjin Binhai New Area [2014BWKZ003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Few studies have explored the risk factors of sarcopenia in certain cohorts. The objective of this study was to examine the incidence of sarcopenia and associated factors over a 1-year period in an elderly Chinese suburban population. Methods: This study was conducted on 356 Chinese suburb-dwelling participants aged >= 60 years, for whom detailed information regarding sociodemographics, behavioral characteristics, and medical conditions had been documented. Sarcopenia was defined according to the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) criteria. Sarcopenia incidence was documented after one year of follow-up, and correlated with several possible factors. Results: At baseline, 64 (9.7%) of the initial 657 participants had sarcopenia. The prevalence of sarcopenia was 10.4% after one year. Between baseline and 1-year follow-up, 13 of the participants without sarcopenia at baseline had developed sarcopenia. After multivariate adjustments, it was found that the incidence of sarcopenia increased with age and high body mass index (BMI) is associated with less incidence of sarcopenia. Incidence was also higher among women. Conclusions: We found sarcopenia incidence increased with age, and women were more likely to have sarcopenia. A higher BMI is also associated with a lower incidence of sarcopenia. Maintaining a healthy weight could be beneficial in the prevention of sarcopenia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据