4.5 Article

Life Cycle Assessment of Hydrogen Production from Coal Gasification as an Alternative Transport Fuel

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 16, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en16010383

关键词

LCA; hydrogen production; coal gasification; CO2 sequestration; well-to-tank

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The gasification of Polish coal to produce hydrogen can help Poland become independent of oil and gas imports and facilitate the transition from gray to green hydrogen.
The gasification of Polish coal to produce hydrogen could help to make the country independent of oil and gas imports and assist in the rational energy transition from gray to green hydrogen. When taking strategic economic or legislative decisions, one should be guided not only by the level of CO2 emissions from the production process, but also by other environmental impact factors obtained from comprehensive environmental analyses. This paper presents an analysis of the life cycle of hydrogen by coal gasification and its application in a vehicle powered by FCEV cells. All the main stages of hydrogen fuel production by Shell technology, as well as hydrogen compression and transport to the distribution point, are included in the analyses. In total, two fuel production scenarios were considered: with and without sequestration of the carbon dioxide captured in the process. Life cycle analysis was performed according to the procedures and assumptions proposed in the FC-Hy Guide, Guidance Document for performing LCAs on Fuel Cells and H-2 Technologies by the CML baseline method. By applying the CO2 sequestration operation, the GHG emissions rate for the assumed functional unit can be reduced by approximately 44% from 34.8 kg CO2-eq to 19.5 kg CO2-eq, but this involves a concomitant increase in the acidification rate from 3.64.10(-2) kg SO2-eq to 3.78.10(-2) kg SO2-eq, in the eutrophication index from 5.18.10(-2) kg PO4-eq3- to 5.57.10(-2) kg PO4-eq3- and in the abiotic depletion index from 405 MJ to 414 MJ and from 1.54.10(-5) kg Sb-eq to 1.61.10(-5) kg Sb-eq.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据