4.5 Article

Perspectives for Expansion of Concentrating Solar Power (CSP) Generation Technologies in Brazil

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 15, 期 24, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en15249286

关键词

renewable energy; concentrating solar power; life cycle assessment; environmental impacts; greenhouse gas; water consumption

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research aims to support the integration of CSP generation in Brazil by analyzing the environmental performance of three CSP technologies. The results indicate that solar tower power (STP) is the most environmentally friendly CSP alternative, with lower greenhouse gas emissions and water consumption compared to other technologies.
The world is moving towards a low-carbon economy through renewable energy sources. In this context, concentrating solar power (CSP) technologies can exploit the rich solar resource in Brazil, diversifying the national electricity mix. The aim of this paper is to support the insertion of CSP generation in the Brazilian bottom-up model MATRIZ by analyzing the environmental performance of three CSP technologies: (i) solar tower power (STP) with a thermal storage system (TSS) of 7.5 h; (ii) solar thermal parabolic trough (STPT) with a TSS of 6 h; and (iii) STPT without TSS. From a life cycle perspective, their freshwater consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are addressed by employing the software SimaPro, the Ecoinvent database, and the ReCiPe 2016 method, as well as information from the system advisory model (SAM) and the literature. As a result, STP is the most environmentally sound CSP alternative, presenting lower GHG emissions and water consumption than the two STPT technologies. In general, CSP generation proves to be more environmentally attractive than some fossil-fired power plants and renewable energy sources. Moreover, moving the manufacturing of CSP technologies to Brazil has the potential to reduce GHG emissions from the upstream processes of their value chain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据