4.1 Article

Fruit and Vegetable, Fat, and Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake Among Low-Income Mothers Living in Neighborhoods With Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-Education

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2016.07.002

关键词

fruit; vegetable; SNAP-Ed; ecological; 24-hour recall; nutrition education; mother; fat; sugar-sweetened beverage

资金

  1. USDA SNAP-Ed

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To examine among low-incomemothers the consumption of fruits and vegetables (FV), high-fat foods, and sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) and overall diet quality in relation to levels of reach of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-Education (SNAP-Ed) interventions across 2,907 California census tracts. Design: Cross-sectional telephone survey conducted from April through October, 2014 using the Automated Self-administered 24-Hour Recall dietary assessment. Participants: Mothers or primary caregivers (n = 6,355) from randomly selected SNAP households. The sample was 42.6% Latina, 25.5% white, and 17.6% African American. The response rate was 60.5%. Main Outcome Measures: Cups of FV; calories from high-fat foods; and cups of SSBs, overall and from items purchased fromfast-food restaurants. Overall diet quality was assessed by the Healthy Eating Index-2010. Analysis: Linear regression controlling for race/ethnicity and education, with significance at P <= .05. Results: Mothers from high SNAP-Ed reach census tracts ate more cups of FV, consumed fewer calories from high-fat foods, and drank fewer cups of SSBs. Healthy Eating Index-2010 scores did not vary by levels of SNAP-Ed reach. Conclusions and Implications: Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-Education interventions are related to increased intake of FV and decreased consumption of high-fat foods and SSBs, but not overall diet quality. Future studies should include assessment of physical activity to investigate caloric balance in association with levels of SNAP-Ed interventions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据