4.6 Article

Transport properties of LaYbO3-based electrolytes doped with alkaline earth elements

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 439, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2022.141702

关键词

Perovskite; LaYbO3; Proton transportation; Stability; Doping; Ionic conductivity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The synthesis and comprehensive study of acceptor-doped lanthanum ytterbates were successfully conducted. These materials showed high chemical stability, good conductivity, and promising proton-conducting properties, making them suitable for various electrochemical devices, such as solid oxide fuel cells.
The rapid development of efficient high-temperature electrochemical devices stimulates the search for new electrolytic materials with high conductivity and excellent chemical stability. From this point of view, lanthanum-containing perovskites can be considered as suitable materials for solid oxide fuel cell applications. In this work, the successfully synthesis and comprehensive study of acceptor-doped lanthanum ytterbates, La1-xMxYbO3-delta (M = Ca, Sr, Ba; x = 0, 0.05, 0.1) is described. X-ray diffraction analysis showed all samples to possess an orthorhombic structure with the space group Pna21, whose stability was confirmed at temperatures up to 1000 degrees C. The high chemical stability of the materials with respect to carbon dioxide and water vapor was confirmed by SEM and XRD methods. The dilatometry data allowed the determination of thermal expansion coefficient values of ceramic samples, which are close to those for conventionally used YSZ electrolytes. The transport properties of the ceramic were studied in a wide range of temperatures (300-900 degrees C) and oxygen partial pressures. It was found that ytterbates doped with 5 and 10 wt.% of strontium and 5 wt.% of barium exhibited the high electrical conductivity among other considered materials. Thus, these materials can be considered as promising proton-conducting electrolytes for various electrochemical devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据