4.6 Article

Constructing hierarchical SnS2 hollow micron cages anchored on S-doped graphene as anodes for superior performance alkali-ion batteries

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 439, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2022.141590

关键词

Layered metal sulfides; Hollow structure; Anode material; Reduced graphene oxide; Alkali-ion batteries

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a hollow micron cage composed of SnS2 nanosheets anchoring on S-doped reduced graphene oxide (H-SnS2@rGO) was prepared through reasonable structure design and surface optimization. The H-SnS2@rGO exhibited remarkable electrochemical performance and opened up a new route for the use of two-dimensional layered sulfides as anode materials for new-type alkali-ion batteries.
Two-dimensional layered metal sulfides have been regarded as worthwhile anodes for Lithium/Sodium-ion batteries (LIBs/SIBs) due to their extraordinary specific capacity and outstanding cyclic stability. Nevertheless, the sluggish reaction kinetics of alkali ions and pulverization in the process of discharging/ charging still restrict further development of layered metal sulfides. Therefore, reasonable structure design and surface optimization become efficacious ways to solve this issue. Herein, a hollow micron cage with a hierarchical structure composed of SnS2 nanosheets anchoring on S-doped reduced graphene oxide (H-SnS2@rGO) was prepared by a two-step hydrothermal method. The layered SnS2 nanosheets provide remarkable kinetic conditions for the rapidly diffusion of alkali ions. Moreover, the synergistic effect of hollow structure and rGO makes H-SnS2@rGO exhibit satisfactory electrochemical performance. Which displays a prominent rate capacity (874.1 mA h g(-1) at 5 A g(-1)) in LIBs and an admirable specific capacity (613.3 mA h g(-1) at 0.1 A g(-1) after 100 cycles) in SIBs. This work opens up a new route for the use of two-dimensional layered sulfides as anode materials for new-type alkali-ion batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据