4.6 Article

Electrode potentials in electrochemical double-layer capacitors with asymmetric electrode thicknesses

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 435, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2022.141364

关键词

Electrode potential; Electrochemical double-layer capacitor; Electrode thickness; High-temperature cycle life

资金

  1. Korea Evaluation Institute of In- dustrial Technology
  2. [20017563]
  3. [RS -2022-00156080]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mass balance of electrodes affects the contribution of each electrode to the cell voltage, and adjusting electrode thickness can balance ion migration resistances to achieve independent contributions. Balancing electrode thickness can prolong electrolyte life and improve performance.
Variation in the mass balance of electrodes affects the contribution of each electrode to the cell voltage in ca-pacitors. Optimizing the mass balance is an efficient method to enhance performance and cycle life. Electrode thickness adjustments can change the ion migration resistances of electrodes. Because tetraethylammonium (TEA) has a higher migration resistance than tetrafluoroborate (BF4), the negative electrode contributes more than the positive electrode to cell voltage. By reducing the thickness of the negative electrode, the contribution of interparticle ion migration of the two ions can be balanced. At a negative-to-positive electrode thickness (N/P) ratio < 0.75, the contribution of each electrode to the cell voltage becomes independent of the current. Furthermore, balancing the electrode thickness allows less exposure to the positive potential range, decreasing the electrolyte decomposition. Cells with less electrolysis last longer at 60 degrees C and 1 A g(-1). However, at an increased current density of 15 A g(-1), the rate capability is more important than electrolysis for a longer cycle life. The fine control of the contribution of each electrode is a valuable tool for enhancing its performance and high-temperature cycle life.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据