4.6 Article

Flexible zinc ion hybrid capacitors with high energy density and long cycling life based on nanoneedle-like MnO2@CC electrode

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 434, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2022.141321

关键词

High energy density; Zn-ion hybrid supercapacitors; Flexible device; Needle-like structures

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. Department of Science and Technology of Jilin Province
  3. Science and Technology Research Project of Jilin Provincial Department of Education
  4. [62004014]
  5. [62004015]
  6. [YDZJ202201ZYTS361]
  7. [JJKH20210735KJ]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A flexible zinc ion hybrid capacitor (ZIHC) device with high capacity and high energy-power densities has been developed, addressing the issues of structure deformation and poor cycling stability.
Zinc ion hybrid capacitor (ZIHC), as a new type of energy storage device, show great potential due to their high energy density and power density. However, their undesired structure deformation and poor cycling stability urgently need to be addressed. Herein, we developed a flexible ZIHC device with nanoneedle-like MnO2@CC as the cathode electrode and activated carbon derived from biomass material loofah as the anode electrode. During the charging generation, the by-products of Zn-4(OH)(6)SO4 center dot xH(2)O is proved to formed on the surface of the electrode, which is one of the key factors for the high capacity. Therefore, the flexible ZIHC device with ZnCl2/MnSO4/PVA electrolyte presents a good specific capacity of 1217.4 mF cm(-2) at 2 mA cm(-2), and high energy-power densities characteristic (676.3 mu Wh cm(-2) at 2000 mu W cm(-2)). More importantly, the device can maintain good performance after bended repeatedly, and the capacity of the device did not decay after 5000 cycles in aqueous electrolyte. The results of our study contribute greatly to the development of safe, reliable, and high electrochemical performance flexible ZIHC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据