4.2 Article

3,6-Diphenyltetrazine as Cathode Active Material for Sodium Ion Batteries

期刊

ELECTROCHEMISTRY
卷 90, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.5796/electrochemistry.22-00100

关键词

Sodium Ion Battery; Organic Battery; Cathode Material; s-Tetrazine

资金

  1. MEXT [JPMXP0112101003]
  2. MEXT: Leading Initiative for Excellent Young Researchers Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [JP20H00400]
  3. Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology [JPMJPR18T2]
  4. Kyushu University Platform of Inter-/Transdisciplinary Energy Research (QPIT)
  5. Industrial Science Research Promotion Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the discharge-charge performance of DPT as a cathode material for sodium ion batteries was investigated. DPT exhibited high reversible capacity and stable discharge-charge profiles, indicating its potential as a sodium ion host.
3,6-diphenyltetrazine (DPT) is an electron-deficient pi-conjugated molecule with a perfectly planar structure and high crystallinity. In this study, discharge-charge tests of crystalline DPT as a cathode material for sodium ion batteries were conducted. DPT showed an initial reversible capacity of 102 mAh/g (theoretical capacity 114 mAh/g), corresponding to one electron reaction. The plateau of the discharge-charge profiles was observed at 1.9-2.1 V vs. Na/Na+. According to the ex-situ XRD, FT-IR, and XPS measurements to investigate the discharge-charge mechanism, the redox center was identified as the conjugated tetrazine ring. DPT was in a crystalline form in both the charged and discharged state and indicated the potential as a reversible Na ion host.(c) The Author(s) 2022. Published by ECSJ. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (CC BY, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse of the work in any medium provided the original work is properly cited. [DOI: 10.5796/electrochemistry.22-00100].

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据