4.7 Article

Can sedentarization decrease the dependence of pastoral livelihoods on ecosystem services?

期刊

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
卷 203, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107612

关键词

Pastoral livelihoods; Ecosystem service dependence; Sedentarization; Household comparison; Ecosystem management

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study finds that sedentarization does not decrease the dependence of pastoral livelihoods on ecosystem services, especially for sedentary farming households in Fuyun County, northwestern China. Livestock remains the main medium by which pastoral households rely on ecosystem services and the main source of income. The importance of monitoring pastoral livelihood dynamics and implementing matching development strategies after settlement to reconcile pastoral livelihoods and ecosystem conservation is emphasized.
Seasonal migration is a widely distributed livelihood strategy in pastoral regions worldwide. To improve live-lihood levels and prevent grassland degradation, sedentarization has been broadly adopted. However, the dependence of pastoral livelihoods on ecosystem services after settlement has scarcely been studied. Here, we develop a new framework to visualize the contributions of grassland ecosystems, farmland ecosystems and so-cioeconomic systems to pastoral livelihoods and take Fuyun County, a typical pastoral county in northwestern China, to analyze whether sedentarization decreases the dependence of pastoral livelihoods on ecosystem ser-vices by comparing the livelihoods of different household types. Settled households derive less income from ecosystem services than household types that practice grazing. However, settlement has not necessarily reduced the share of income from ecosystem services. Settled household types still rely on grassland ecosystems, espe-cially sedentary farming households. Although pastoralists have undergone tremendous livelihood transitions, livestock have always been the main medium by which pastoral households rely on ecosystem services and the main source of income. Our results emphasize the importance of monitoring pastoral livelihood dynamics and implementing matching development strategies after settlement to reconcile pastoral livelihoods and ecosystem conservation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据