4.7 Article

Hybrid material based on single walled carbon nanotubes and cobalt phthalocyanine bearing sixteen pyrene moieties as a sensing layer for hydrogen sulfide detection

期刊

DYES AND PIGMENTS
卷 209, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2022.110903

关键词

Hybrid material; Gas sensors; Carbon nanotubes; Phthalocyanines; Hydrogen sulfide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a sensor platform for the determination of hydrogen sulfide based on a new hybrid material was developed. The hybrid material consisted of single-walled carbon nanotubes functionalized with a novel cobalt phthalocyanine bearing pyrene substituents. The hybrid material showed good structural characteristics and exhibited selective detection of low concentrations of hydrogen sulfide in the presence of other interfering gases.
We report on a sensor platform for the determination of hydrogen sulfide based on a new hybrid material ob-tained by the non-covalent functionalization of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNT) with a novel cobalt phthalocyanine bearing 16 pyrene substituents (CoPc-Pyr). The structural features of the hybrid were investi-gated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), UV-Vis spectroscopy, and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The sensor characteristics of SWCNT/CoPc-Pyr hybrid layers prepared by spin coating of its suspension in dichloromethane were studied against low concentrations of hydrogen sulfide (0.5-50 ppm) with the limit of detection (LOD) of 38 ppb and response and recovery time of 60 s and 80 s, respectively. This LOD value lies in the appropriate range and the prepared hybrid material is promising for the creation of the sensors for the detection of H2S, which can be used as an important biomarker of halitosis and asthma. It was shown that the SWCNT/CoPc-Pyr hybrid could be successfully used for the selective detection of H2S in the presence of carbon dioxide, hydrogen, ethanol, acetone, and dichloromethane.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据