4.7 Review

Small biotechs versus large pharma: Who drives first-in-class innovation in oncology?

期刊

DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY
卷 28, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2022.103456

关键词

Biopharmaceutical R& drug development; cancer; oncology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is a narrative that large pharma relies on biotech and academia for drug innovation. However, our research shows that while biotechs and academia do originate more drugs, large pharma remains important in shepherding drugs through clinical development and approval, and in originating high-impact novel therapies. Our analysis of FDA-approved first-in-class oncology drugs from 2010 through 2020 indicates that large pharma was the sole originator of only 14% of these drugs, while small biotechs originated 46%, and academic labs 14%. Despite this, large pharma companies launched or were involved in launching 76% of these drugs, including three of the five top-selling ones.
There is a narrative that large pharma relies on biotech and academia for drug innovation. We tested this thesis by identifying the originators of all 50 first-in-class (FIC) oncology drugs that were approved by the FDA from 2010 through 2020. Overall, the numbers support the narrative: large pharma was the sole originator of only 14% of FIC cancer drugs, whereas small biotechs originated 46%, and academic labs 14%. However, origins tell an incomplete story: large pharma companies launched or were involved in launching 76% of FIC cancer drugs. Moreover, three of the five top-selling FIC oncology drugs had large pharma origins. Thus, although biotechs and academia do originate more drugs, large pharma remains important in shepherding drugs through clinical development and approval, and in originating high-impact novel therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据