4.6 Article

Induction of Immune-Stimulating Factors and Oncolysis Upon p14ARF Gene Transfer in Melanoma Cell Lines

期刊

DNA AND CELL BIOLOGY
卷 42, 期 6, 页码 274-288

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/dna.2022.0115

关键词

adenovirus; apoptosis; immunogenic cell death; gene therapy; oncolysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores oncolysis induced by nonreplicating adenoviral vectors used for p14(ARF) and interferon-beta (hIFN beta) gene transfer in human melanoma cell lines, and reveals an unexpected role for p14(ARF) in promoting cellular responses predictive of immune stimulation.
Together with an anti-tumor immune response, oncolysis using a recombinant viral vector promises to eliminate cancer cells by both gene transfer and host-mediated functions. In this study we explore oncolysis induced by nonreplicating adenoviral vectors used for p14(ARF) and interferon-beta (hIFN beta) gene transfer in human melanoma cell lines, revealing an unexpected role for p14(ARF) in promoting cellular responses predictive of immune stimulation. Oncolysis was confirmed when UACC-62 (p53 wild-type) cells succumbed upon p14(ARF) gene transfer in vitro, whereas SK-Mel-29 (p53-mutant) benefitted from its combination with hIFN beta. In the case of UACC-62, in situ gene therapy in nude mice yielded reduced tumor progression in response to the p14(ARF) and hIFN beta combination. Potential for immune stimulation was revealed where p14(ARF) gene transfer in vitro was sufficient to induce emission of immunogenic cell death factors in UACC-62 and upregulate pro-immune genes, including IRF1, IRF7, IRF9, ISG15, TAP-1, and B2M. In SK-Mel-29, p14(ARF) gene transfer induced a subset of these factors. hIFN beta was, as expected, sufficient to induce these immune-stimulating genes in both cell lines. This work is a significant advancement for our melanoma gene therapy strategy because we revealed not only the induction of oncolysis, but also the potential contribution of p14(ARF) to immune stimulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据