4.6 Article

Graphatic-C3N4@MoO3 heterostructure synthesis via a facile green route and their visible light-driven photocatalytic activity for the degradation of Rhodamine B dye

期刊

DIAMOND AND RELATED MATERIALS
卷 132, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.diamond.2022.109631

关键词

Heterostructure; MoO3; RhB dye degradation; Visible light irradiation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A green approach was used to synthesize heterostructures of g-C3N4@MoO3 and their structural, morphological, and optical features were characterized by XRD, UV-vis, SEM, and FTIR techniques. The XRD analysis showed higher crystallinity and intensity of g-C3N4/MoO3 compared to g-C3N4 and MoO3. The g-C3N4 exhibited a crumpled layered arrangement while MoO3 had a rod-like structure. The optical properties of g-C3N4/MoO3, including refractive index, bandgap energy, and extinction coefficient, were significantly enhanced.
A green approach was employed for the synthesis of heterostructures of g-C3N4@MoO3 and characterized by XRD, UV-vis, SEM and FTIR techniques to evaluate the structural, morphological, and optical features of the heterostructures. The XRD analysis revealed the high crystallinity and intensity of g-C3N4/MoO3 higher than the g-C3N4 and MoO3. The g-C3N4 shows a crumpled layered arrangement and a MoO3 rod-like structure. The refractive index (n), bandgap energy (Eg) and extinction coefficient (k) (optical properties) are determined by UV-vis spectroscopy. The g-C3N4/MoO3 optical properties like k (2.15), n (2.37), dielectric coefficient (0.43), electronegativity (0.739) and bandgap energy (2.75 eV) were enhanced significantly. In visible region, the gC3N4/MoO3 demonstrated excellent performance for the degradation of RhB dye. The mobility and detachment of electron-hole pairs in type-II heterojunction semiconductors are responsible for the enhancement of photocatalytic activity (PCA) in visible region, which can be utilized for the dyes remediation in effluents under natural sunlight irradiation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据