4.7 Article

Medical and surgical treatment of postbariatric hypoglycaemia: Retrospective data from daily practice

期刊

DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 735-747

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dom.14920

关键词

bariatric surgery; cohort study; hypoglycaemia; observational study; real-world evidence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In daily practice, pharmacotherapy for postbariatric hypoglycaemia (PBH) has shown good efficacy, with combination therapy often being beneficial. However, a portion of patients ultimately require surgical intervention, which also yields good results.
Aim: To evaluate medical and surgical treatment of postbariatric hypoglycaemia (PBH) in daily practice. Materials and Methods: Retrospective data were extracted from medical records from four hospitals. PBH was defined by neuroglycopenic symptoms together with a documented glucose Results: In total, 120 patients were included with a median follow-up of 27 months with a mean baseline age of 41 years, total weight loss of 33% and glucose nadir 2.3 mmol/L. Pharmacotherapy consisted of acarbose, diazoxide, short- and long-acting octreotide and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist analogues (liraglutide and semaglutide) with an overall efficacy in 45%-75% of patients. Combination therapy with two drugs was used by 30 (25%) patients. The addition of a second drug was successful in over half of the patients. Long-acting octreotide and the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist analogues scored best in terms of efficacy and side effects with a median duration of use of 35 months for octreotide. Finally, 23 (19%) patients were referred for surgical intervention. Efficacy of the surgical procedures, pouch banding, G-tube placement in remnant stomach and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass reversal, pooled together, was 79% with a median duration of initial effect of 13 months. Conclusions: In daily practice, pharmacotherapy for PBH was successful in half to three quarters of patients. Combination therapy was often of value. One in five patients finally needed a surgical procedure, with overall good results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据