4.7 Article

Position of meristems and the angles of the cell division plane regulate the uniqueness of lateral organ shape

期刊

DEVELOPMENT
卷 149, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/dev.199773

关键词

KEY WORDS; AN3; GIF1; Cell division; Lateral organ; Leaf meristem; Morphology; Vertex model; Arabidopsis thaliana

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Fellows [JP19J14140]
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology [JP25113002, JP19H05672]
  3. University of Tokyo GPLLI/WINGS-LST
  4. GSGC programme
  5. University of Tokyo

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared the cell proliferative zones in floral organs and leaf organs under different conditions and found that the shape of floral organs depends on the position of the meristem, while the shape of leaf organs depends on the cell division angles.
Leaf meristem is a cell proliferative zone present in the lateral organ primordia. In this study, we examined how cell proliferative zones in primordia of planar floral organs and polar auxin transport inhibitor (PATI)-treated leaf organs differ from those of non-treated foliage leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana, with a focus on the accumulation pattern of ANGUSTIFOLIA3 (AN3) protein, a key element for leaf meristem positioning. We found that PATI-induced leaf shape changes were correlated with cell division angle but not with meristem positioning/size or AN3 localisation. In contrast, different shapes between sepals and petals compared with foliage leaves were associated with both altered meristem position, due to altered AN3 expression patterns, and different distributions of cell division angles. A numerical simulation showed that meristem position majorly affected the final shape but biased cell division angles had a minor effect. Taken together, these results suggest that the unique shapes of different lateral organs depend on the position of the meristem in the case of floral organs and cell division angles in the case of leaf organs with different auxin flow.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据