4.7 Article

Cell-specific effects of the sole C. elegans Daughterless/E protein homolog, HLH-2, on nervous system development

期刊

DEVELOPMENT
卷 150, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/dev.201366

关键词

Caenorhabditis elegans; bHLH; Neurogenesis; HLH-2; Daughterless; E protein

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated whether there are common mechanisms of neurogenesis throughout the entire nervous system of C. elegans. Our findings suggest that while distinct proneural class II bHLH factors play a role in neurogenesis, their function is not universal and is instead limited by lineage, cell type, and differentiation programs affected. Genetic removal of the hlh-2 gene activity showed broad effects on neurogenesis but still allowed for normal neurogenesis in many neuron-producing lineages.
Are there common mechanisms of neurogenesis used throughout an entire nervous system? We explored to what extent canonical proneural class I/II bHLH complexes are responsible for neurogenesis throughout the entire Caenorhabditis elegans nervous system. Distinct, lineage-specific proneural class II bHLH factors are generally thought to operate via interaction with a common, class I bHLH subunit, encoded by Daughterless in flies, the E proteins in vertebrates and HLH-2 in C. elegans. To eliminate function of all proneuronal class I/II bHLH complexes, we therefore genetically removed maternal and zygotic hlh-2 gene activity. We observed broad effects on neurogenesis, but still detected normal neurogenesis in many distinct neuron-producing lineages of the central and peripheral nervous system. Moreover, we found that hlh-2 selectively affects some aspects of neuron differentiation while leaving others unaffected. Although our studies confirm the function of proneuronal class I/II bHLH complexes in many different lineages throughout a nervous system, we conclude that their function is not universal, but rather restricted by lineage, cell type and components of differentiation programs affected.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据