4.5 Article

Reconciling neuronal representations of schema, abstract task structure, and categorization under cognitive maps in the entorhinal-hippocampal-frontal circuits

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY
卷 77, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

CURRENT BIOLOGY LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2022.102641

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R01MH121736, R01AG063864, R01AG066806]
  2. PRESTO grant from Japan Science and Technology Agency [JPMJPR1681]
  3. Brain Research Foundation Fay-Frank Seed Grant [BRFSG-2017-04]
  4. Whitehall Foundation Research Grant [2017-08-01]
  5. BrightFocus Foundation Research grant [A2019380S]
  6. Alzheimer's Association Research Grant [AARG-17-532932]
  7. New Vision Research Investigator Award [CCAD 201902]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Learning leads to the formation of neuronal representations of acquired knowledge, traditionally referred to as cognitive maps in the hippocampus. Recent research has expanded this framework to include non-spatial memory and discovered similar knowledge representations in the entorhinal cortex and frontal cortex.
Learning leads to a neuronal representation of acquired knowledge. This idea of knowledge representation was tradi-tionally developed as a cognitive map of spatial memory represented in the hippocampus. The framework of cognitive mapping has been extended in the past decade to include not only spatial memory, but also non-spatial factual and temporal memory. Following this conceptual advancement, a line of recent neurophysiological research discovered such knowl-edge representations not only in the hippocampus, but also in the entorhinal cortex and frontal cortex. Although the distinct terms cognitive map, schema, abstract task structure or categorization were used in these studies, it is likely that these terms can be reconciled as a common mechanism of learned knowledge representations. Future experimental work will be required to differentiate the parametric nature of knowledge representations across brain areas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据