4.7 Article

Electrochemical and localized corrosion behavior of 316 L SS/copper/316 L SS sandwich composite in chloride-containing environment

期刊

CORROSION SCIENCE
卷 209, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2022.110719

关键词

Metallic composite; 316 L SS; Copper; Galvanic corrosion; Pitting

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China
  3. Innovative Talents Training Project of University of Science and Technology Beijing
  4. Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsr?det)
  5. [51874036]
  6. [2021YFB3701305]
  7. [2021-04157]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the electrochemical and localized corrosion behavior of a 316L SS/copper/316L SS composite in a 0.5 wt. % NaCl solution was investigated using electrochemical measurements and high-resolution microscopic examination. Galvanic coupling accelerated the dissolution at the internal surface and pitting attack at the external surface of the 316L layer. Polarization up to 1 V/SCE resulted in the formation of a corrosion product layer composed of metal oxides/hydroxides on top of the passive film.
Electrochemical and localized corrosion behavior of a 316 L SS/copper/316 L SS composite in 0.5 wt. % NaCl solution was investigated from cross-sectional and plane directions by electrochemical measurements and high -resolution microscopic examination. The galvanic coupling accelerated the dissolution at the internal surface and pitting attack at the external surface of the 316 L layer. Polarization up to 1 V/SCE resulted in formation of a corrosion product layer (ca. 992 nm) composed of metal oxides/hydroxides on top of the passive film, which consisted of a Fe2O3-rich outer layer (3.3 nm) and a Cr2O3-rich inner layer (4.1 nm). The copper corrosion was quite uniform.Data availability statement: The raw/processed data required to reproduce these findings cannot be shared at this time as the data also forms part of an ongoing study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据