4.7 Article

The effect of carbonation on chloride redistribution and corrosion of steel reinforcement

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 363, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129641

关键词

Corrosion; Steel reinforcement; Chloride; Carbonation; Raman spectroscopy; Electrochemical impedance spectrum (EIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Desalinated sea sand concrete (DSSC) is increasingly used to replace natural river sand, but the corrosion risks of steel reinforcement in DSSC due to chloride and carbon dioxide attacks are a major concern. This study monitored the corrosion process of steel reinforcement embedded in cement paste containing chloride ions and found that corrosion was initiated before carbonation occurred. The study reveals that carbonation-induced chloride redistribution rather than pH decrease dominates the corrosion initiation.
Desalinated sea sand concrete (DSSC) is increasingly used to mitigate the shortage of natural river sand. How-ever, one major concern lies in the corrosion risks of steel reinforcement embedded in DSSC under combined chloride and carbon dioxide attacks. To understand the corrosion mechanism, the corrosion process of steel reinforcement embedded in the cement paste containing chloride ions (Cl-) was monitored by electrochemical measurements, during which pH, Cl- profile and corrosion products were examined simultaneously. Raman spectroscopy was employed to evaluate the carbonation depth in microscale. Tests results showed that corrosion was initiated before the carbonation front reached the steel reinforcement. Interestingly, it was the carbonation -induced Cl- redistribution rather than the decrease of pH that dominated the corrosion initiation. Before the carbonation front, a Cl-accumulation zone was identified, and the corrosion mechanism was revealed. This study shall advance the understanding of the corrosion of steel reinforcement in DSSC for durability design of reinforced concrete structures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据