期刊
COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES
卷 276, 期 -, 页码 -出版社
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2022.106943
关键词
Support vector regression; Cross validation; Probability density evolution method; Pseudo-interpolation replacement; Structural reliability
In this paper, an active-learning reliability method called ASVR-PDEM is proposed to reduce the computational cost in structural reliability analysis. The method combines the support vector regression (SVR) and the probability density evolution method (PDEM). The empirical probability distribution of the SVR is proposed based on the leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) strategy, and two learning functions are proposed based on the PDEM-oriented expected improvement function. The results show that the ASVR-PDEM outperforms conventional reliability methods in terms of computational accuracy, efficiency, and computational time, especially for time-consuming dynamic reliability problems.
To reduce the high computational cost of the probability density evolution method (PDEM) for structural reliability analysis, an active-learning reliability method that combines the support vector regression (SVR) and the PDEM is proposed, which is abbreviated as the ASVR-PDEM. First, the empirical probability distribution of the SVR is proposed based on the leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) strategy. On this basis, two different learning functions are proposed according to the concept of the PDEM-oriented expected improvement function, which accommodate to any type of metamodels in essence. Then, the pseudo-interpolation replacement is devised to avoid the prediction error of the SVR at the representative points in the region of interest and, thus, maintains the precision of failure probability. Moreover, the influences of four key ingredients on the proposed method are investigated, namely the type of meta -models, the form of learning functions, the deployment of the pseudo-interpolation replacement and the training scheme in the LOOCV strategy. Three numerical examples are investigated to show the fea-sibility of the ASVR-PDEM. Comparisons are made against several conventional reliability methods. The results highlight the superiority of the ASVR-PDEM in terms of computational accuracy, efficiency and computational time, especially in the case of the time-consuming dynamic reliability problems.(c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据