4.7 Article

ana_cont: Python package for analytic continuation

期刊

COMPUTER PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS
卷 282, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2022.108519

关键词

Analytic continuation; Pad?; Maximum entropy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents the Python package ana_cont, which is used for the analytic continuation of fermionic and bosonic many-body Green's functions using either the Pade approximants method or the maximum entropy method. The determination of hyperparameters and the implementation are described in detail. The code is publicly available on GitHub, where documentation and learning resources are also provided.
We present the Python package ana_cont for the analytic continuation of fermionic and bosonic many -body Green's functions by means of either the Pade approximants or the maximum entropy method. The determination of hyperparameters and the implementation are described in detail. The code is publicly available on GitHub, where also documentation and learning resources are provided.Program summaryProgram Title: ana_cont CPC Library link to program files: https://doi.org/10.17632/vphzykvvf2.1Developer's repository link: https://github .com /josefkaufmann/ana_contLicensing provisions: MITProgramming language: Python External dependencies: Python (> 3.6), numpy, scipy, matplotlib, h5py, PyQt5, CythonSupplementary material: Test case files, tutorials, and instructions Nature of problem: Analytic continuation of correlation functions from Matsubara frequencies/imaginary time to real frequencies. Solution method: Pade interpolation, maximum entropy method Additional comments including restrictions and unusual features: The most important features can be accessed through the graphical user interface. For more flexibility, it is recommended to use the code as a library and write problem specific scripts.(c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据