4.7 Article

Non-constant steady states and Hopf bifurcation of a species interaction model

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2022.106846

关键词

Species interaction; stability; Non -constant steady states; Hopf bifurcation; Allee effect

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the species interaction model with the ratio-dependent Holling III functional response and strong Allee effect. The existence and non-existence of steady states, temporal bifurcation, and the boundedness of global positive solutions are explored. Results on the upper and lower bounds of positive solutions for the associated elliptic system are provided. The impact of the ratio-dependent Holling III functional response and strong Allee effect on the dynamical behaviors of the species interaction systems is illustrated through numerical simulations.
In this paper, we are concerned with the species interaction model with the ratio -dependent Holling III functional response and strong Allee effect. To explore nonho-mogeneous solutions of the model, we consider the existence and non-existence of non-constant steady states and temporal bifurcation. Then we show the boundedness of the global positive solutions for the parabolic system and present the upper and lower bounds of positive solutions for the associated elliptic system. The non-existence and existence of the non-constant steady states of the elliptic system with the homogeneous Neumann boundary conditions are obtained by using the priori estimates, maximum principle and index theory. Furthermore, the existence and the direction of Hopf bifurcation are investigated via the stability analysis, center manifold theory and normal form reduction. Numerical simulations are carried out to verify our theoretical analysis and to illustrate that the ratio-dependent Holling III functional response and strong Allee effect have strong impact on dynamical behaviors of the species interaction systems.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据