4.6 Article

Biochar supported magnetic ZIF-67 derivatives activated peroxymonosulfate for the degradation of ciprofloxacin: Radical and nonradical pathways

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.130559

关键词

ZIF-67; Biochar; Peroxymonosulfate (PMS); Ciprofloxacin; Degradation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a novel magnetically recoverable composite catalyst BC/CoNC derived from ZIF-67 and peanut shell was designed and applied for the activation of peroxymonosulfate (PMS) to degrade Ciprofloxacin (CIP). The results showed that the catalyst exhibited excellent removal efficiency and wide application potential, effectively degrading CIP in different water samples.
Developing highly efficient and reusable heterogeneous catalysts is the key to achieve peroxymonosulfate (PMS) activation for pollution degradation. Herein, a novel magnetically recoverable composite catalyst BC/CoNC derived from ZIF-67 and peanut shell was designed and applied for peroxymonosulfate (PMS) activation to degrade Ciprofloxacin (CIP). The results of structural characterization showed that ZIF-67 derived CoNC was uniformly distributed on peanut shell biochar and there was no obvious agglomeration. The 1.0-BC/CoNC exhibited the optimal removal efficiency, CIP was degraded by 95.9% within 30 min, and the removal efficiency of TOC was 42.0%. In the meantime, the catalyst demonstrated a high PMS activation capacity over a wide pH range of 3-11. Both electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) studies and radical quenching experiments revealed that SO4 center dot-, center dot OH, O-2(center dot-) and O-1(2) were involved in the degradation of CIP. In addition, the 1.0-BC/CoNC/PMS system can effectively degrade different pollutants in water, and the potential application for the degradation of CIP in actual water samples (the tap water and lake water) were also investigated. This work proposes new ideas for the preparation of low-cost biomass/MOFs derived catalysts for the application of water treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据