4.7 Article

Tsunami wave loading on a structural array behind a partial wall

期刊

COASTAL ENGINEERING
卷 179, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2022.104244

关键词

Wave loading; Tsunamis; Sheltering; Seawalls; Macroroughness; Tsunami forces; Tsunami experiments; Structural array

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates long wave loading on a building array behind a high-elevation, varying-length seawall through laboratory experiments. The results show that the cross-shore peak load decreases with the sheltering angle, while the highest loads occur when the seawall exposes the structures. Flow concentration around the end of the wall leads to higher velocities when a structure is just exposed, resulting in large loads for nonbreaking waves at these wall lengths.
This paper examines long wave loading on a building array behind a high-elevation, varying-length seawall through laboratory experiments conducted in Oregon State University's Directional Wave Basin. Long wave forcing in the form of solitary waves and error function waves was applied to both pre-inundated high water level conditions with currents, and to low water level runup loading without currents. Behind the wall, the cross-shore peak load declined as a function of the sheltering angle; on the other hand, the highest loads occurred with seawall lengths that exposed the instrumented structures. Flow concentration around the end of the wall caused higher velocities when a structure was just exposed, and led to large loads for nonbreaking waves at these wall lengths. For cases with breaking waves, particularly for inundation conditions, the wave breaking location was also a determining factor of the magnitude of loading, as larger loads were observed when a wave broke far enough in front of the first structure that a strong bore had developed. These results will serve to provide a better understanding of the wave impact to a coastal urban region in a tsunami event when the seawall is breached.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据