4.6 Editorial Material

CORR Insights®: Are Observational Studies on Distal Radius Fracture Treatment Robust? An E-value Approach to Analysis

相关参考文献

注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。
Review Orthopedics

Are Observational Studies on Distal Radius Fracture Treatment Robust? An E-value Approach to Analysis

Chien-Wei Wang et al.

Summary: This study aimed to compare complication frequencies among different treatment modalities for distal radius fractures (DRF) and evaluate the robustness of these observational studies using the E-value as an index for unmeasured confounding. The results showed that there were no significant differences in complication risks among different DRF treatments, but the observed complication frequencies from most comparative observational studies were not robust against potential unmeasured confounders. Therefore, the E-value method or other types of sensitivity analysis should be implemented in individual-study level in hand surgery research to assess robustness against potential unmeasured confounders.

CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH (2023)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Limitations and Misinterpretations of E-Values for Sensitivity Analyses of Observational Studies

John P. A. Ioannidis et al.

ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2019)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Sensitivity Analysis in Observational Research: Introducing the E-Value

Tyler J. VanderWeele et al.

ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2017)

Article Orthopedics

Incidence of Extensor Pollicis Longus Tendon Rupture After Nondisplaced Distal Radius Fractures

Kevin M. Roth et al.

JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME (2012)