Performance of discs, sensititre EUMDROXF microplates and MTS gradient strips for the determination of the susceptibility of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa to cefiderocol

Objectives: To evaluate the performance of commercially available tests to determine the susceptibility of multidrug-resistant (MDR) clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains to cefiderocol. Methods: A collection of 150 clinical strains of P. aeruginosa resistant to ceftazidime, (MIC, Minimal Inhibitory Concentration, MIC > 8 mg/L) imipenem (MIC> 4 mg/L) and ceftolozane/tazobactam (MIC> 4/4 mg/L), isolated from 2015 to 2022 was selected. Cefiderocol susceptibility was determined in parallel (a) by disc diffusion using Mast, Oxoid and Liofilchem discs deposited on Mueller-Hinton agar batches from Bio-Rad, BioMerieux, Mast, Becton Dickinson, I2A and Oxoid; (b) by MIC gradient test strips (MTS) (Liofilchem); and (c) by EUMDROXF Sensititre microplates. MICs and inhibition zones were compared with the broth microdilution reference method (BMD) MICs. Results: The MIC50 and MIC90 of cefiderocol were 1 mg/L and 8 mg/L by BMD, respectively, including 21.3% (32/150) resistant strains. None of the methods tested fulfilled acceptable criteria (essential agreement [EA] > 90%; bias = +/- 30%). Although the Sensititre EUMDROXF microplates overestimated MIC values (categorical agreement [CA] = 86.7% [130/150, 95% CI 80.3-91.2]; EA = 69.3% [104/150, 95% CI 61.6-76.2]; bias = 68.2%), MTS strips underestimated the MIC values for many strains (CA = 86.7%, 130/150, 95% CI 80.3-91.2; EA = 69.3%, 104/150, 95% CI 61.6-76.2; bias = similar to 30.4%), classifying properly only 50% (16/32) of resistant strains. Finally, many cefiderocol-resistant strains were not identified by the disc method, although the CA ranged from 78.0% (117/150, 95% CI 70.7-83.0) to 89.3% (134/150, 95% IC 83.4 -93.3) according to Mueller-Hinton agar batches. Conclusion: Determination of cefiderocol susceptibility in MDR P. aeruginosa clinical strains by Sensititre EUMDROXF microplates is an alternative to the reference BMD method. However, MIC values +/- 1 dilution apart from the breakpoint (2 mg/L) should be controlled by BMD whereas the use of MTS gradient strips is discouraged. Disc diffusion might be useful for screening, unfortunately many cefiderocol-resistant strains are not detected. (c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

Automated summary

This study evaluated the performance of commercially available tests for determining the susceptibility of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa to cefiderocol. The Sensititre EUMDROXF microplates were found to be an alternative to the reference method, but MIC values +/- 1 dilution apart from the breakpoint (2 mg/L) should be confirmed by the reference method, and the use of MTS gradient strips is not recommended. Disc diffusion may be useful for screening, but many cefiderocol-resistant strains are not detected.