4.7 Article

Considerations for Drug Development in Myelodysplastic Syndromes

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 29, 期 14, 页码 2573-2579

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-3348

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MDS drug development faces challenges in biology, trial design, and endpoints. To meet patient needs, approaches to improve MDS drug development should consider disease evolution, patient age, and real-world treatment conditions.
Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) have historically been challenging diseases for drug development due to their biology, pre-clinical modeling, and the affected patient population. In April 2022, the FDA convened a panel of regulators and academic experts in MDS to discuss approaches to improve MDS drug development. The panel reviewed challenges in MDS clinical trial design and endpoints and outlined considerations for future trial design in MDS to facilitate drug development to meaningfully meet patient needs. Challenges for defining clinical benefit in patients with MDS include cumbersome response criteria, standardized transfusion thresholds, and application and validation of patient reported outcome instruments. Clinical trials should reflect the biology of disease evolution, the advanced age of patients with MDS, and how patients are treated in real-world settings to maximize the likelihood of identifying active drugs. In patients with lower-risk disease, response criteria for anemic patients should be based on baseline transfusion dependency, improvement in symptoms, and quality of life. For higher-risk patients with MDS, trials should include guidance to prevent dose reductions or delays that could limit efficacy, specify minimal durations of treatment (in the absence of toxicity or progression), and have endpoints focused on overall survival and durable responses. MDS trials should be designed from the outset to allow the practicable application of new therapies in this high-needs population, with drugs that can be administered and tolerated in community settings, and with endpoints that meaningfully improve patients' lives over existing therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据