4.1 Review

Therapeutic non-ectasia applications of cornea cross-linking

期刊

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY
卷 106, 期 6, 页码 580-590

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08164622.2022.2159790

关键词

Corneal cross-linking; Customized corneal crosslinking (CurV); Photoactivated chromophore for infectious keratitis (PACK)-CXL; Photorefractive intrastromal CXL (PiXL)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Corneal cross-linking is a technique using riboflavin and ultraviolet-A light to strengthen corneal tissue. It has been effective in treating corneal ectasia and has expanded into other applications such as treating microbial keratitis and correcting refractive error. This review provides an overview of current evidence and future developments in non-ectasia applications of corneal cross-linking.
Corneal cross-linking is a photopolymerization technique traditionally used to strengthen corneal tissue. Corneal cross-linking utilizes riboflavin (vitamin B2) as a photosensitizer and ultraviolet-A light (UVA) to create strong covalent bonds within the corneal stroma, increasing tissue stiffness. Multiple studies have demonstrated corneal cross-linking's effectiveness in treating corneal ectasia, a progressive, degenerative, and non-inflammatory thinning disorder, as quantified by key tomographic, refractive, and visual parameters. Since its introduction two decades ago, corneal cross-linking has surpassed its original application in halting corneal ectatic disease and its application has expanded into several other areas. Corneal cross-linking also possesses antibacterial, antienzymolytic and antioedematous properties, and has since become a tool in treating microbial keratitis, correcting refractive error, preventing iatrogenic ectasia, stabilising bullous keratopathy and controlling post keratoplasty ametropia. This review provides an overview of the current evidence base for the therapeutic non-ectasia applications of cornea cross-linking and looks at future developments in the field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据