4.8 Article

Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Chemical and Biocatalytic 2'3'-Cyclic GMP-AMP Synthesis

期刊

CHEMSUSCHEM
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cssc.202201629

关键词

biocatalysis; cyclic dinucleotides; enzyme catalysis; life cycle assessment; sustainable chemistry

资金

  1. CLIB-Competence Center Biotechnology (CKB) - European Regional Development Fund (EFRE)
  2. North-Rhine Westphalian Ministry of Economic Affairs, Innovation, Digitalization and Energy (MWIDE) [EFRE-0300098]
  3. Projekt DEAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Life cycle assessments can provide insights into the environmental impact of production processes. This study compared the environmental impact of biocatalytic and chemical synthesis of 2'3'-cGAMP and found that biocatalytic synthesis is superior in all considered categories. Early assessment is crucial for making informed decisions about synthesis routes.
Life cycle assessments (LCAs) can provide insights into the environmental impact of production processes. In this study, a comparative LCA was performed for the synthesis of 2'3'-cyclic GMP-AMP (2'3'-cGAMP) in an early development stage. The cyclic dinucleotide (CDN) is of interest for pharmaceutical applications such as cancer immunotherapy. CDNs can be synthesized either by enzymes or chemical catalysis. It is not known which of the routes is more sustainable as both routes have their advantages and disadvantages, such as a poor yield for the chemical synthesis and low titers for the biocatalytic synthesis. The synthesis routes were compared for the production of 200 g 2'3'-cGAMP based on laboratory data to assess the environmental impacts. The biocatalytic synthesis turned out to be superior to the chemical synthesis in all considered categories by at least one magnitude, for example, a global warming potential of 3055.6 kg CO2 equiv. for the enzymatic route and 56454.0 kg CO2 equiv. for the chemical synthesis, which is 18 times higher. This study demonstrates the value of assessment at an early development stage, when the choice between different routes is still possible.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据