4.7 Article

Feed as a source of dioxins and PCBs

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 308, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136243

关键词

Dioxins; PCBs; Feed; Contamination; Congener patterns

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dioxins and polychlorinated biphenyls, classified as persistent organic pollutants, primarily enter the human body through the diet, with animal feed being a significant contributor. This study found that plant-based feed materials were the main source of exceedances of dioxin and PCB limits in feed, followed by vegetable oils and fats of animal origin.
Dioxins (PCDD/PCDF) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are a group of undesirable chemicals classified as persistent organic pollutants (POPs). The main route of human exposure to these compounds is through the diet (about 80%), with food of animal origin being the predominant source. For this reason, animal feed can contribute significantly to the presence of these compounds in food. The aim of this study was to present the concentrations of dioxins and PCBs as well as congener profiles in feed exceeding the acceptable limits (277/ 2012/EU). In addition, an attempt was made to identify the source of contamination for the different types of contaminated feedstuffs. Among a total of 743 samples of feed materials from the Polish market tested between 2013 and 2021, exceedances of the maximum levels of dioxins and PCBs were found in 21 samples (2.8%). The largest group among the non-compliant feed samples were feed materials of plant origin (43%) followed in decreasing order by vegetable oils and fats of animal origin (24%), materials of mineral origin (9%), and fish oils and meals (5%). The exceedances of the dioxin limits in the category feed materials of plant origin were only caused by dried materials (pulp, dried alfalfa, dried apple). Furthermore, for 8 (1%) samples, the concentrations of test substances exceeding the Action Levels (AL) were recorded.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据