4.7 Article

Nanocomposite membranes for organic solvent nanofiltration: Recent advances, challenges, and prospects

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 308, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136329

关键词

Membranes; Nanocomposite; Organic solvent nanofiltration (OSN); Solvent resistant; Separation mechanism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Organic solvent nanofiltration (OSN) is a promising technology for separating organic solvents in various industries. This review examines the use of nanomaterials, such as COFs, MOFs, MOs, and CBMs, in OSN membranes. The advances in nano-based OSN membranes, including TFN membranes and MMMs, are discussed, as well as the challenges and recommendations for further research in this field.
Organic solvent nanofiltration (OSN) is an emerging technology for the separation of organic solvents that are relevant to the petrochemical, pharmaceutical, food and fine chemical industries. The separation performance of OSN membranes has continued to push the boundary up through advanced membrane fabrication techniques and novel materials for fabricating the membranes. Despite the many advantages, OSN membranes still face such challenges as low solvent permeability and durability in harsh organic solvent conditions. To overcome these limitations, attempts have been made to incorporate nanomaterial fillers into OSN membranes to improve their overall performance. This review analyzes the potential and use of nanomaterials for OSN membranes, including covalent organic frameworks (COFs), metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), metal oxides (MOs) and carbon-based materials (CBMs). Recent advances in the state-of-the-art nano-based OSN membranes, in the form of thin-film nanocomposite (TFN) membranes and mixed matrix membranes (MMMs), are reviewed. Moreover, the separation mechanisms of OSN with nano-based membranes are discussed. The challenges faced by these OSN membranes are also elaborated, and recommendations for further research in this field are provided.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据