4.5 Article

Processing Mechanism of Massa Medicata Fermentata Based on the Correlation Analysis of Strains, Chemical Compositions and Anti-Inflammatory Activity

期刊

CHEMISTRY & BIODIVERSITY
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cbdv.202200822

关键词

Massa Medicata Fermentata; chemical compositions; anti-inflammatory activity; strains; processing mechanism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, UPLC/MS and GNPS methods were used to predict chemical compositions of fermented medicine. The dynamic changes of strains, chemical compositions and anti-inflammatory activity during fermentation process were investigated, and the interactions between strains, chemical compositions and efficacy were revealed. The potential strains related to the production of anti-inflammatory ingredients were identified.
The traditional Chinese medicine of fermented medicine may be under the involvement of multiple strains and the interaction between these microorganisms. Liu Shenqu (Massa Medicata Fermentata, MMF) is one of the most widely used fermented medicines, whose potential processing mechanism is still unclear. In this work, UPLC/MS and GNPS methods were employed to rapidly predict chemical compositions in MMF. Moreover, the dynamic changes of strains, chemical compositions and anti-inflammatory activity of MMF during fermentation process were investigated, and subsequently strains-chemical compositions-efficacy interactions were revealed by Pearson correlation analysis and partial least squares regression (PLSR) analysis. As a result, 24 components were identified, and the potential strains including Bacillus, Burkholderia_Caballeronia_Paraburkholderia, Enterobacter, Aspergillus heterocaryoticus, Rhizopus arrhizus, Kazachstania bulderi, which related to the production of anti-inflammatory active ingredients were exposed. These results demonstrated chemical compositions-strains-efficacy interactions during fermentation of MMF, and provide reference for the exploration of the processing mechanism of MMF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据