4.6 Article

Revealing the wetting mechanism of Li plus -doped ionic liquids on the TiO2 surface

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
卷 265, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2022.118211

关键词

Ionic liquids; Lithium-ion; Electrode interface; Molecular dynamics simulation; Energy storage

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the wetting processes of Li+-doped ionic liquids (ILs) on a TiO2-B(10 0) surface using molecular dynamics simulation. The results show that the doping of Li+ changes the orientation of ILs, weakens the ILs-substrate interaction, and significantly slows down the wetting process. As the Li+ concentration increases, the contact angle increases, indicating a transition from hydrophilic to hydrophobic behavior. On the other hand, heating reduces the contact angle. These results demonstrate that the strong adsorption of Li+ at the interface dominates the wetting process of Li+-doped ILs.
The sensible design of ionic liquid (IL)-based application relies on a thorough knowledge of the structure and characteristics of electrolyte-electrode interfaces. Here, the wetting processes of the Li+-doped ILs droplets on the TiO2-B(10 0) surface are investigated by molecular dynamics simulation. According to the spatial distributions of components, doped Li+ prefers to substitute the ILs and adsorb to the sub-strate, causing the orientation changes of the ILs, weakening the ILs-substrate interaction, and slowing down the wetting process significantly. As Li+ concentration rises from 0 to 80 %, the contact angle increases from 86.97 to 131.18 degrees, inducing the hydrophilic-to-hydrophobic transition. On the contrary, heating up would reduce the contact angle by extending the contact length and enhancing the maximum density of Li+-doped ILs at the interface. These quantitative results prove that the dense adjacent layer in the interface induced by the strong adsorption of Li+ dominates the wetting process of Li+-doped ILs. (c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据