4.6 Article

Flow patterns of ionic liquid based aqueous biphasic systems in small channels

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
卷 265, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2022.118197

关键词

Two-phase flows; Flow patterns; Small channels; Ionic liquids; Aqueous biphasic systems; Process intensification

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ionic liquid based aqueous biphasic systems (IL-ABS) were formed by adding a hydrophilic ionic liquid (C4mimCl) and a kosmotropic salt (K3PO4) to water. Flow patterns in capillary channels were investigated for the first time, using three different internal diameters and weight concentrations of the IL and salt. The main flow patterns observed were plug, dispersed, and parallel flow, which were influenced by both channel diameter and weight concentrations. A generalized flow pattern map was plotted based on capillary and Reynolds numbers, showing the collapse of plug flow boundaries.
Ionic liquid based aqueous biphasic systems (IL-ABS) were formed by the addition in water of a hydro-philic ionic liquid (1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium Chloride, C4mimCl) and a kosmotropic salt (tripotas-sium phosphate, K3PO4). The flow patterns of IL-ABS were studied in capillary channels with 0.2, 0.5 and 0.8 mm internal diameter; this is the first time such two-phase flows have been investigated. Three weight concentrations of the ionic liquid and the salt (18, 20 and 22 wt%) were chosen within the biphasic region. The main flow patterns included plug, dispersed and parallel flow. It was found that both channel diameter and weight concentrations would affect the flow patterns observed. Finally, a gen-eralized flow pattern map was plotted using a combination of capillary and Reynolds numbers, where the transition boundaries of plug flow collapsed for all ionic liquid and salt concentrations studied.& COPY; 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据