4.7 Review

Clean power generation from salinity gradient using reverse electrodialysis technologies: Recent advances, bottlenecks, and future direction

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 452, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.139482

关键词

Salinity gradient power; Reverse electrodialysis; Ion -exchange membranes; Fouling; Electrochemical reactions; Economic feasibility

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article reviews recent advances in ion-exchange membranes (IEMs), process design, and optimization of reverse electrodialysis (RED) systems. Challenges in pilot-scale and field-scale systems are discussed, and future research directions for enhancing the economic feasibility of RED for salinity gradient power (SGP) generation are proposed.
Reverse electrodialysis (RED) is an emerging renewable energy technology that generates electricity by combining concentrated and diluted streams with varying salinities. Ion-exchange membranes (IEMs) have undergone significant advancements in RED, with an enhanced understanding of system configuration and operation conditions for increased power generation. This comprehensive review focuses on recent advances in IEMs, process design, and optimization of RED systems over the last five years. Challenges in the pilot-scale and field-scale systems are discussed, as well as practical limitations such as IEM fouling and electrochemical re-actions on electrodes. Future research directions for enhancing overall performance, power generation, and economic feasibility of RED for salinity gradient power (SGP) generation are also proposed. Future advances in the following directions will increase the economic feasibility of RED application in SGP: 1) development of scalable IEMs with high anti-fouling efficiency, mechanical strength, and ion selectivity/conductivity, 2) process optimization (including pre-treatment) for IEM and electrode fouling mitigation, and 3) control of undesirable irreversible faradaic reactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据