4.7 Article

Fluoroalkane modified cationic polymers for personalized mRNA cancer vaccines

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 456, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.140930

关键词

Fluoropolymer; mRNA Delivery; Antigen presentation; Personalized mRNA cancer vaccine; Cancer immunotherapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Scientists have synthesized F-PEI nanovaccine for mRNA delivery, which can induce dendritic cell maturation and trigger effective antigen presentation, leading to strong anti-tumor immune responses. This research provides a new tool for mRNA delivery, promising for personalized cancer vaccines as well as other mRNA-based immunotherapies.
Messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines, while demonstrating great successes in the fight against COVID-19, have been extensively studied in other areas such as personalized cancer immunotherapy based on tumor neoantigens. In addition to the design of mRNA sequences and modifications, the delivery carriers are also critical in the development of mRNA vaccines. In this work, we synthesized fluoroalkane-grafted polyethylenimine (F-PEI) for mRNA delivery. Such F-PEI could promote intracellular delivery of mRNA and activate the Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)-mediated signaling pathway. The nanovaccine formed by self-assembly of F-PEI and the tumor antigen-encoding mRNA, without additional adjuvants, could induce the maturation of dendritic cells (DCs) and trigger efficient antigen presentation, thereby eliciting anti-tumor immune responses. Using the mRNA encoding the model antigen ovalbumin (mRNAOVA), our F-PEI-based mRNAOVA cancer vaccine could delay the growth of established B16-OVA melanoma. When combined with immune checkpoint blockade therapy, the F-PEI-based MC38 neoantigen mRNA cancer vaccine was able to suppress established MC38 colon cancer and prevent tumor reoccurrence. Our work presents a new tool for mRNA delivery, promising not only for personalized cancer vaccines but also for other mRNA-based immunotherapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据