4.7 Article

Hollow Carbon Nanofibers with Inside-outside Decoration of Bi-metallic MOF Derived Ni-Fe Phosphides as Electrode Materials for Asymmetric Supercapacitors

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 450, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.138363

关键词

Asymmetric supercapacitors; Hollow carbon nanofibers; Bi-metallic metal-organic framework (MOF); Metal phosphides; Energy storage

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), Korean government (MSIT) [2019R1A5A8080326, 2022R1A2C2007676]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2022R1A2C2007676] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bi-metallic metal-organic frameworks (MOF) generated phosphides within and outside hollow carbon nanofibers (HCNFs) demonstrate remarkable potential for energy storage due to improved conductivity and high specific capacitance.
Bi-metallic metal-organic framework (MOF) generated phosphides within and outside the hollow carbon nanofibers (HCNFs) show remarkable potential for energy storage owing to their improved conductivity and high specific capacitance. A novel approach is used to synthesize (Ni-Fe)-P-C on the outer and inner surfaces of HCNFs. The synthesized material's substantial electrochemical performance is owing to the co-existence of numerous Ni and Fe-based redox-active species with porous carbon and open channels from MOF-derived Carbon at HCNFs for fast electrolyte ions/electron diffusion. Consequently, the (Ni-Fe)-P-C@HCNFs electrode has a high specific capacitance of 1392 F g(-1) at 1 A g(-1) and good cycling stability, with capacitance retention of approximately 89 % at 25 A/g. Moreover, after 10,000 cycles, the asymmetric supercapacitor (ASC): (Ni-Fe)-P-C@HCNFs//Fe-P-C@HCNFs has an optimal energy density of 62.7 Wh kg(-1) and a power density of 8238.2 W kg(-1), with cycling stability of 92.4 percent at a high current density of 25 A g(-1).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据