4.7 Article

Bioinspired micropillar array with micropit for robust and strong adhesion

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 454, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.140227

关键词

Bioinspired adhesion; Direct laser writing; Micropillars; Micropits; Robust structure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inspired by gecko setae and octopus sucker, a micropillar array with frustum of conical micropits (FCM) was fabricated by direct laser writing lithography. The optimized FCM micropit design achieved an adhesion strength of 1.2 MPa under a loading force of 5 mN, which is significantly higher than other micropillar structures. Compliant contacts formed between FCM micropillars and the counterpart surface under larger loading forces result in a uniformly distributed stress at the separating interface, leading to strong adhesion. Moreover, FCM showed robust adhesion performance even after 1000 cycles of attaching and detaching.
Robust and strong adhesion is highly required for reversible adhesions. Inspired by gecko setae and octopus sucker, micropillar array with frustum of conical micropits (FCM) was fabricated by direct laser writing lithography. With an optimized micropit in FCM, the adhesion strength of 1.2 MPa is achieved under a loading force of 5 mN, which is 3.7 and 2.1 times the micropillars with flat punch top and circular conical micropit, respectively. Under a loading force larger than 3 mN, compliant contacts are formed between FCM micropillars and the counterpart surface, which results in a uniformly distributed stress at the separating interface, an instantaneous detachment of multiple FCM micropillars, and therefore a strong adhesion. Moreover, the adhesion of FCM is quite robust that 1000 cycles of attaching and detaching have no influence on the adhesion performance. The work here not only provides a bioinspired structure for strong and robust adhesion but also consolidates the concept of combining features from different biological systems to create new functional materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据